Posts filed under 'Digital Media Relations'

Why You Should Get Excited About Twitter

Posted June 26th, 2008 by Brian Cavoli

After months dismissing Twitter as a fad, I jumped in earlier this year and quickly discovered a whole new social media community… and a new perspective on the business impact of social media in the future. Twitter may be the purest form of social media and the change in web behavior that Twitter represents may be may become one of the most exciting opportunities for marketers on the web.

Social media is all about candid conversations and developing relationships. Blogs started it all by giving people a new voice, but that voice is still largely a one-way conversation. Most posts don’t have many comments, especially when you eliminate all the simple “great post” or “thanks for mentioning me/my company” entries. Sure you’ll see a few high profile blogs with hundreds of posts debating the issues and building on the points of the blog, but once you get beyond Technorati’s top 100 that level of interaction is rare.

Forums and discussion boards are a step up and many communities have deep and insightful conversations on very niche topics. The problem is you often have to look pretty hard to find these groups and you often see many people shouting at each other hiding behind anonymous usernames.

Twitter is different. The culture of Twitter is very open and personal. People are identified by their real names and their picture appears next to their name whenever they participate. A click on your name brings you to a profile page with a history of your tweets and links to your blog or website. Conversation occurs is real-time so whatever is on people’s minds at home and at work is represented here, as it happens. As you can imagine, that includes many discussions about brands and product experiences.

There is certainly a lot of noise here, but that is what monitoring tools like Radian6 and specialty search engines like Summize are for. As with any type of social media, the sheer volume of conversations requires that you use smart tools to organize the data and apply metrics to understand the trends.

Companies are involved now. For example, Comcast has been widely praised for the way they are using Twitter. Service reps are monitoring tweets about the brand and reaching out personally to get their service problems solved. Customers love to see that their voice matters and companies are taking them seriously.

The funny thing is that the opportunity here isn’t necessarily about Twitter. Twitter itself may not even be a big part of this trend in the future – unless they get bought. Twitter is a private, understaffed organization struggling to find a way to make money…and they have a lot of shortcomings. I see the “fail whale” more than I see my kids in a typical day. What’s important here is that Twitter is a great innovation that started a new type of consumer behavior.

Thanks to Twitter, people are now comfortable making frequent posts about what they are doing and what they are thinking throughout the day. Aggregators like Friendfeed make this even more interesting. They collect your “tweets” and then add many of your other online activities - like shared news items from your RSS reader, Facebook updates, and product reviews submitted - and make them all available in a single “lifestream” that is published online.

Not only does this lifestream change the way people present themselves online, it encourages them to share more. Google talked about this at the Supernova conference recently. They say people have been reluctant to share a lot of their lives because they don’t want to feel like they are interrupting and spamming their friends. In this new lifestreaming environment, sharing is encouraged since friends can subscribe to your news feed and view your pictures, stories, product reviews and commentary when they want to see them. People are now motivated to share more of their life as they grow their network and shape their online image.

As the information in these profiles become richer it becomes even easier to get advice and recommendations on purchase decisions from your extended online social network. This pushes the influence of corporate marketing and advertising messages even further away from the consumer.

But this is where social media marketing gets interesting. Lifestreaming facilitates the power of consumer-to-consumer influence making it even more important for companies to be actively involved in social media. These profiles are a new window into the lives of the advocates and critics surrounding your brand. You can learn a lot more about what they like or dislike and track the impact of their influence all across the web so you can engage with them on a more personal level and participate in their lifestream.

I use Twitter to communicate and share interesting interactive and social media news and issues. If you find that interesting, follow me here.

Digg! del.icio.us! Technorati!

Add comment

Are You Qualified to Blog About US?

Posted February 29th, 2008 by Kevin

“Submit the URL of your blog and we’ll let you know whether or not you qualify to blog about our products and receive a free sample!”

Huh? Is this some sort of joke?

“We won’t send just anyone a sample of our product. If you have a significant audience that will help generate awareness of our brand while limiting the loss we would experience by allowing just ANY blogger to participate, then submit your URL and we’ll let you know whether you’re worthy.”

Ok…so these aren’t actual quotes, but they might as well be. Notice that I have not included the company name. This was intentional, but clearly not designed to protect the innocent. It’s missing because I am very curious to hear what everyone’s first reaction is.

Let’s take a look at some previous outreach campaigns and the associated risk:

Nikon D80 – Risk Level: High
As most know, Nikon offered the new D80 to popular bloggers for 3 months at no cost with an option to buy at a discounted rate at the end of the trial period. Nikon took a big risk as these camera’s (worth approximately $800) could have been damaged, stolen or “lost” during the initiative. However, as everyone knows, the campaign was a huge success and most likely worth the risk if you ask anyone at Nikon.

(UNM2PNM) Join the Conversation by Joseph Jaffe – Risk Level: Low
Sending out copies of your book to interested readers is a smart idea and something authors have been doing for decades. Asking them to review it once they are done is very “conversational.” Asking them to then post that review on Amazon.com is covering your bases! As the copy of the book costs $30 retail and Joseph offered it to 130 interested people who may have bought the book anyway, he essentially lost about $4,000 (after postage).

  • Side note: I still owe Jaffe a review…which means I have yet to hold up my end of the bargain…which means I need to start reading…which means I’ll do it and I apologize.

These are two great examples of activating a community. Now, how would you do the same thing if your product was food? Does it matter?

Even if your product can’t be returned, it can be shared and should be shared. For examples on how to do this activity right, read Hugh Macleod’s post on Stormhoek. They sent out 100+/- cases, doubled sales in less than 12 months and received significant reviews in the blogosphere.

Now, take a look at this recent campaign by Joffrey’s Coffee & Tea Company called Java Beta Test. It’s getting some pretty good buzz from Mashable and CNET, but when I signed up; I wasn’t thrilled with the response I received:

Hi Kevin,

You have successfully submitted (email address) for inclusion in the Joffrey’s Java beta test invite list.

If your blog is chosen to participate, we will send you an invitation!

Thank you,

Joffrey’s Coffee and Tea Company

What exactly do they mean by “chosen?” What are the criteria for being chosen? If you’re wondering what my first reaction was, refer to paragraphs one and two.

Digg! del.icio.us! Technorati!

3 comments

No Response

Posted January 10th, 2008 by Char Lyn

Mack over at the Viral Garden had a post yesterday that gave a great tip for using Google to monitor your brand in the blogosphere. He also underlined the importance of corporations leveraging the free market research available through blogs. However, I disagreed with the underlying message of his post, which implied that corporations don’t monitor the blogs and should always respond to blog posts about them.

Good marketers know when no response is the best course of action. Here are some examples:

  • A truthful, transparent response will incite more negative posts.
  • Responding may expose the company to legal action or increased regulatory oversight.
  • Entering the conversation opens a floodgate that requires continued involvement beyond the resources of the company.

Still don’t believe me? Then you probably also think the customer is ALWAYS right. Now I do believe that you should do everything within your power to make a customer happy, but there are some customers whose happiness would drive you out of business. When those customers blog, no response is the best route.

Do you have other scenarios when a corporation shouldn’t respond? I’d love to hear them. Also feel free to comment about your vehement opposition to the content of my post. Just be aware that I may not respond.

@Jennifer Laycock Please don’t misconstrue my post in any way. I loved your post and subsequent comments. In your specific case, Panera’s best response may be to allow each franchise location to determine the log in time interval, in which case you could get the local manager to give you unlimited access.

Digg! del.icio.us! Technorati!

Add comment

Ford’s snazzy social media press release

Posted October 11th, 2007 by admin

Ford’s Social Media Press Release…Good job Ford.

Digg! del.icio.us! Technorati!

Add comment

Previous Posts